top of page
Micaela F. Lipman
Jan 1
1 min read

Updated: Sep 7

On top, there is a copy of a zine page done by Ehler. The zine page depicts two caricatured faces in yellow, red, and blue with a red line between their mouths with the words "youth community" written on it in white ink. Above the faces are the words "youth not for" in cut out magazine letter style.  Below the zine  page is an image of one of the charts from the paper depicting  youth meaning units from comprehensive plans separated by anti-adultist and adultist themes.
Zine page by Ehler.


Abstract: Applying an anti-adultist theoretical framework, this paper utilizes content analysis to assess youth representation within Maryland county and municipal comprehensive plans. All county plans reference youth, but over a quarter of municipal plans omit any reference to adolescents. Nearly half of the plans (45.80%; n = 60) reproduce adultist views of young people, while a small fraction (7.63%; n = 10) incorporate anti-adultist perspectives. Most plans (73.28%; n = 96) acknowledge the need for distinct youth services. However, nominal recognition of youth without meaningful youth empowerment falls short of anti-adultist praxis. Planning scholars and practitioners must grapple with adultist bias to foster youth inclusion and recognize youth as valuable community members with needs and preferences that are distinct from other age groups.


 
 

Publications

bottom of page